• Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s plenty of countries with cheap insulin, and people there are fine because other treatments for diabetes are cheaper too.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Pardon me, but, Mr Rose, can you please tell me… What fucking better treatments?

    My brother is T1D and he’s been like that since his teens. Literally the only way for him to continue to live, at all, is to take insulin.

    It’s times like this that make me thankful I don’t live in the USA.

    But seriously, if anyone knows of a “better” treatment for type 1 diabetes, I’m all ears. I’ve been looking for something for my brother for years, and I’ve come up with jack shit.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Basically they’ve come up with insulin analogs that are faster acting, ones that are longer lasting, and even ones that “lock” themselves so they can’t be absorbed without a high enough presence of glucose

      Here’s a paper comparing a bunch of them. I’m no expert and it’s a deep rabbit hole, but there are a bunch of options, each with their own trade-offs

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Bullshit take. Some people ONLY respond to insulin. Fuck whoever wrote this.

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I apologize if this sounds pedantic, but what if the writer was forced to write it to keep his job along with his family’s access to food, shelter, and healthcare? So rather than punch down, I say punch up. I say fuck the owners who ultimately signed off on the article and potentially demanded it in the first place. (The Atlantic is owned by Emerson Collective which is owned by billionaire Laurene Jobs. )

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        what if the writer was forced to write it to keep his job along with his family’s access to food, shelter, and healthcare?

        You cant compare existential harm with a direct and tangible one. If the author is in dire straits and writing under duress, let him voice that in his own defense when he is called to account. But preemptively forgiving bad behavior on a remote “maybe” is a recipe for the end of civilization.