• tVxUHF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    We just need to add I2P directly into the client in a way that’s transparent to the user and all the problems are solved.

    • Kane@femboys.biz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      There are providers that do not provide you your own IPv4 address, with a feature called “CGNAT”. Often, they will then block you from port-forwarding altogether.

  • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    IPv6. My stupid ISP actually shipped their router with all inbound ipv6 blocked with no way to unblock it, so I set up opnsense. Works like a charm!

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s not v6 itself, it’s rather lack of layers of nat that prevent forwarding a v4 for most folks.

        • clove@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Hmm, so no firewall in the router blocking ports, instead blocking happens on the actual client?

          • azuth@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Port forwarding is necessary due to NAT not firewalls.

            It’s not that your router blocks new incoming connections at port X, it’s that it does not know which local client it’s meant for, since it’s addressed to the public IP that is held by your router.

            With IP6 it’s lan client also gets assigned a public IP6 address (as there are plenty) and so the router receives a connection addressed to a Lan client and knows where to route it.

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        It doesn’t fix it, per se, rather removes the need for layers of hacks such as nat and cg-nat. Every device gets a globally routable IP - no need to forward anything, just open the port you want.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Localhost NAS with large storage, Rclone to seedbox, synch, remove old content from seedbox

        Source: I have 8TB rn and about to add more, this is how I use my seedbox and store shit

        • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Only seeding new stuff that everyone else is also seeding is not good for torrenting in general, it will kill a lot of content that’s more than a few years old and/or not completely mainstream.

          • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah most seedboxers are just the new leechers of this generation… Keeping up their ratio about an unreasonable amount where they can leech everything they want without the need to give back…

            They just stay for the necessary amount of time specified by their private tracker and leave the queue afterwards.

            IMO seedboxes should have another rule associated to them… Straight to 1 month seeding time or get a hit&run warning !

            • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I wouldn’t call them leechers since they are seeding back to build said ratio. I think it’d be more accurate to call them a single component of a larger ‘structure’ including people like myself who permaseed from home on a slower connection. If it were all people like me, we’d all be waiting days for new releases to fully download and if it were all seedboxes, we would have zero seeders for anything older than a month or two. Many private trackers incentivize long-term seeding to help control this imbalance, and I think it works well in my experience.

  • Rogue Satellite@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    As someone who has recently started seeding as much as I can, this is a great question to which I don’t have the answer.

    I am not renewing my Proton yearly subscription after it ends due to recent developments. They seem to be the only “big name” VPN with the port forwarding feature. I heard of OpenVPN, but have not had a chance to dig into it too much.

    My ISP does not provide IPV6 support, so this will be pretty important to sort out soon.

    • bigDottee@geekroom.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I seem to be out of the loop in regards to proton controversy and I haven’t found anything outstanding against them…

      Can you help me understand what you’re specifically referring to? I’m a proton user… so kinda want to know lol

      • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        as far as I can tell their CEO is a semi alt right cunt. Apart from that everythin seems pretty okay and the recent shift to nonprofit status is cool

        • Night Monkey@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          😂 does everything have to be political now? I don’t care if the dude is a space alien who birthed Hitler, if the service is solid, I’m using it.

          • Luke@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Everything has always been political. Just because you’re too privileged to notice that until someone mentions a viewpoint you dislike doesn’t mean anything except that you’re usually oblivious.

          • Danitos@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            It has always been. FOSS is by itself political, just beyond the basic binary logic of left/right.

            Your apoliticism is a political instance as well. Take for instance this quoute from Desmond Tutu “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”

            I’m not saying you have to ditch Proton over their CEO’s takes, my point is that thinking that everything suddenly became political is naive.

      • Nursery2787@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        CEO is a libertarian idiot who can’t see any difference between American Republicans and Democrats. CEO doesn’t have absolute control of proton, that’s a board of other privacy advocates. Proton as a service provider is still safe despite their CEO being a political twit.

        IMO: A libertarian who doesn’t understand any value in why a government could possibly be good is the kind of person I want running an encryption service company. Wouldn’t trust him for running anything else though.

        Devils advocate: Both parties love the alphabet agencies unconditionally and historically saw no problem with them. Still waiting for the Snowden wrist slap to happen. He is a bigger idiot for not letting public relations for the company handle his opinion.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Proton as a service provider is still safe despite their CEO being a political twit.

          That twit was allowed to use the company’s Mastodon account to double-down on his shitty political post

          • Nursery2787@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah, I’ll wait for him to start telling Engineers that the encryption infrastructure has to be done his way. And telling the proton board that the engineers are all liars.