cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 15 days agoNot incorrect.mander.xyzimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down11
arrow-up13arrow-down1imageNot incorrect.mander.xyzcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 15 days agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareprettybunnys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·14 days agoInterpreted languages have classically been called scripting languages, it’s pedantic but it has use and meaning in the industry.
minus-squaremasterspace@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23 days agoThere is no purpose to mislabeling something and speaking inaccurately in a professional setting.
minus-squareNaich@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·14 days agoPedantic correct. The best type of correct.
minus-squaremasterspace@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23 days agoNo, it’s not. It’s objectively inaccurate. A computer does not care whether the instructions it’s executing were compiled ahead of time or interpreted on the fly and they literally never have.
Interpreted languages have classically been called scripting languages, it’s pedantic but it has use and meaning in the industry.
There is no purpose to mislabeling something and speaking inaccurately in a professional setting.
Pedantic correct. The best type of correct.
No, it’s not. It’s objectively inaccurate.
A computer does not care whether the instructions it’s executing were compiled ahead of time or interpreted on the fly and they literally never have.