• skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    Do Elon now. He owns way too much shit and always tries for a monopoly. Start by nationalizing star link.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Why nationalize it? Surely treating Starlink like a utility and putting it under an independent org would be better, no? Keep politics out of it and let ISPs pay for access like how MVNOs like Mint Mobile work, except prevent the entity that owns it from providing service directly.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    Google says government proposals would “harm America’s consumers.”

    Says the company that couldn’t stand by the core value “don’t be evil”.

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Musk will be champing at the bit to own a controlling share of both of these. It disgusts me to agree with them but they’re right. This is the single worst possible time to try and push this through.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        This is the single worst possible time to try and push this through.

        Which is why it’s happening now, I agree.

        But we, the non-billionaires are still better off after any monopoly split. It’s hard to express how incredibly bad powerful monopolies are. The fact that another billionaire will be the buyer sucks, but it’s no reason to back away from forcing the legally required split.

  • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    The DOJ is asking the court to force Google to promptly and fully divest itself of Chrome, along with any data or other assets required for its continued operation. It is essentially aiming to take the Chrome user base—consisting of some 3.4 billion people—away from Google and hand it to a competitor

    Fuck yes, shatter that shit.

      • radix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Seriously. The only people willing to pay what it’s “worth” will end up doing the same thing (or worse).

        What we need are some actual privacy laws with teeth, so that the data isn’t worth as much to begin with.

      • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Elon’s a dunce, so he’ll probably enshittify it so badly that people will leave. So google is weakened and chrome dies (at least, i hope in a good outcome)

        • NightOwl@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          That regular people would stop using chrome if it turned into xhrome is highly unlikely. These are people who browse without adblocker, use facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter, and buy Amazon echos. It’d just lead to Doge influencing the direction of xhromium based browsers.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    selling android or breaking it up would be terrible since you just go back to each manufacturer making their own flavor with no updates or compatability.

    • amelore@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’d be good for Android to be mostly its base, the Android Open Source Project. Over the years Google put more and more things in the proprietary part of Android (Google Play Services) instead of AOSP.

      Depends on who takes over whether that gets better of course. If they also put too much in Play Services, or ask the manufacturers for a high fee, yes it’s possible we go back to more oem flavours.

    • Shayeta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      Disagree, you might be right in the short term, but long term competition like that only benefits the customer.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      I used to believe this, before google turned evil. Right now I’d take 5 shitty flavours than the pure shit google is doing. They have turned into a vile corporation that needs to be cut down

      • mke@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        The monkey giggles. Mozilla completely pivots to adtech & AI.

        P.S. for the record, I continue using a Firefox fork and don’t plan on stopping. Criticism where it’s due, but I still think they’re the best option.

      • Harold@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        You know what, good. Maybe it’ll cause the people who keep using Chrome because they don’t give two shits about their privacy to get off their asses and use something else.

        Just like whole tribes are refusing to move from WhatsApp to Signal, because they say they care about privacy, but actually they don’t.

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Reading the article helps to answer this question:

      The DOJ is asking the court to force Google to promptly and fully divest itself of Chrome, along with any data or other assets required for its continued operation.

      It also links the filing, see specifically “III. Plaintiffs’ Revised Proposed Final Judgment”

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      They’ll bend eventually. Money does that.

      Remember when DeSantis went to war with Disney? And Disney destroyed him and any chance he had to being a presidential candidate and we all cheered? Then Disney went around to make allegiance with all the non-DeSantis Republicans?

      It’s all money for stockholders at the end of the day. Not people, not who sits at the throne.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Corporations are the shareholders they care about, people like you and mean never own a majority of a company’s stocks

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              What I’m saying is that when you say “people are the shareholders”, they’re not the shareholders that matter. BlackRock, Vanguard, Fidelity, these are the shareholders that major publically traded companies care about. They might technically need to care about retail investors as well, in the end they’re not the ones who have the power to sway the votes one way or another.

  • Yozul@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I mean, I’d love to see Google broken up, but this isn’t news. DoJ has been asking specifically for Chrome to be sold for over a year now, and the lawsuit was started during the first Trump administration. Until the judge actually reaches a decision this is just recycled old news.

  • Walican132@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Interesting. Why focus on selling chrome? I’m not sure I understand the DOJ here. Google could end Chrome and continue updating chromium instead of selling if not for this directive. Given they are approved to continue working on chromium I don’t see why the sale is being forced.

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      The monopoly is the problem, someone using a pixel, using android, browsing using chrome, using Google search to find your website, visit an article website where you sign in via Google, see Google ads throughout, click on an affiliate link to buy a featured product of the blog and post using Google pay.

      This is classic monopoly and Google chrome is small dab middle of it, if you want to break a chain you start from breaking it in the middle instead of the end like Google pay. Hopefully other things will follow soon.