• feoh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Glad to hear about the “opt in”.

    Partially blind guy here who struggles to use computers these days because EVERYTHING IS FREAKING TEENY TINY TEXT YOU CAN’T CHANGE ESPECIALLY MOBILE AAAAAH IT HURTS.

    Ahem.

    Yes I’m a bit bitter :)

    • Ferk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Another thing is that this standard does not allow setting an absolute size… you can only use fractions, for example, 2/3 of normal size, which can still be relatively big if your normal size is big.

      I also expect making things bigger for emphasis (or adding headings) would likely be more common than making them smaller (that’s what I hope at least). Outside of things like mathematical notation where superscript/subscript might be useful (see this comment for some examples).

      The problem with the web is that some websites use absolute units that might not scale well (like px) to define the sizes.

  • mub@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m waiting for the day when these enhanced terminals go full GUI and mouse driven.

  • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Kitty is probably the best terminal emulator I’ve ever tried out… It even made me drop Tmux as multiplexer on my stupid Mac !

    I only have basic use case right now, nothing complex but customization seems way above others.

    The full OSC52 integration with micro for copy/past over SSH and taking up the terminal clipboard was also a game changer (nearly dropped micro because of this…)

    I only scratched the surface and have only basic usage and still I can’t believe one single person is behind this project (I think?).

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      As a non-user of kitty, why did it make you drop tmux? Don’t they do different jobs?

    • juipeltje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I like it mainly because of the image protocol and supporting both x11 and wayland. I still have alacritty installed as well because i like how damn fast it is. If alacritty had proper image support i’d probably only be using alacritty, but they are both great terminal emulators.

      • tankplanker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I recently switched from alacritty to ghostty as I wanted image support as ghostty implements the kitty protocol for it. Ghostty seems as fast as alacrity to me, but with better support. It even has a tmux type replacement, although I haven’t used it as I don’t need it with sway doing that for me.

          • tankplanker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Its a bit slower than Alacritty for my use case, not massively enough, but enough to put me off. The extra functionality such as its TMUX stuff I just do not need. I think if you want a more fully featured terminal, particularly if you do a lot of code writing in the terminal, then I would pick Kitty.

            I only really do quick remote editing in the console so its not important for me, and I do not want TMUX as I use a tiling WM. Terminal launch speed is particularly important to me because of this.

            I haven’t tried foot yet, that is meant to be good for wayland and as I use Sway it might be better fit. I would need to get frustrated with Ghostty before I could be bothered to switch, which is what happened to me with Alacritty over image support, shallow as that sounds.

        • lazycat@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Ghostty is fast? It takes like 2 full seconds to open and I’m not even exaggerating. Kitty, Alacritty and foot take only a few microseconds to launch. I feel the same in regards to Alacritty, I’d use it as default if it had image support. For now I’m using foot.

          • tankplanker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Something wrong there, Ghostty is just as quick for me. Are you using an older PC?

            Both load for me in milliseconds, even with fastfetch stuck in my startup.

            • lazycat@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Don’t know about old but definitely not slow. My PC has a ryzen 5 3600 and RTX 3060. All terminals have a fast startup time except for Ghostty.

              • tankplanker@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                ryzen 5 3600

                Yeah thats what I would call old now, lol.

                There is 100% something wrong with your Ghostty.

                Heres a shitty gif I made to show you how fast Ghostty, Alacritty and Konsole is on my PC, all way less than a second and I am running a ton of background crap including different 4k animated wallpapers. Gif

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Images in the terminal? At that point you’re just reinventing the GUI.

        • lazycat@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          How am I supposed to get previews working in Yazi then? It’s not 1969 anymore. If you don’t like it stay on tty.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I just don’t see the advantage of shoehorning graphics backwards into text interfaces when we’ve got an entire integrated graphical desktop.

        • juipeltje@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s very convenient for terminal based file managers. I use it to preview my wallpapers images and then i use a keybind to set it as the wallpaper for my window manager. I also recently started using rmpc, an mpd client that can display album art.

    • mac@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Interesting, that’s the guy that develops calibre as well

    • Luke@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      This is cool! I’m almost more interested in the underline gaps for descenders that got snuck in as a “oh yeah I did this too” feature. That makes underlined text so much easier to read, IMO.

      underlined text example